The Pennsylvania Public Official and Employee Ethics Act has been in effect since 1979 and must be carefully followed by state and local officials and employees. Mainly, the Act requires that public officials file annual statements disclosing their financial interests, but it also prohibits activities that have been deemed a violation of the public’s trust. The Act is enforced by the State Ethics Commission, which is comprised of seven politically appointed commissioners assisted by a staff of investigators and prosecutors. Repercussions for violating the Act include administrative penalties, civil fines/restitution, and sometimes criminal prosecution.
Continue Reading Criminalizing Politics: Ethical Obligations of Pennsylvania’s Public Officials
Constitutional law
Court Holds Union Membership ‘Worthy of Constitutional Protection’
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals, the appeals court that has jurisdiction over federal cases in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware and the U. S. Virgin Islands, recently held that a public employer violates the First Amendment of the United State Constitution when it retaliates against an employee based on the employee’s union membership. In reaching its conclusion, the Court distinguished between First Amendment “free speech” claims and First Amendment “association” claims.
Continue Reading Court Holds Union Membership ‘Worthy of Constitutional Protection’
PA Supreme Court Revives the Environmental Rights Amendment
McNees attorney Claudia Shank recently authored a series of blog posts on the McNees Land Use Blog on the Supreme Court’s revival of the Environmental Rights Amendment to the Pennsylvania Constitution. The Environmental Rights Amendment provides in pertinent part:
Pennsylvania’s public natural resources are the common property of all the people including generations yet to
…
Supreme Court Reins in the Seventh Circuit and Reaffirms Fourth Amendment Protections
In January 2015, the Seventh Circuit, recognizing that it was an outlier among the Circuits in holding that pretrial detainees could not sue under the Fourth Amendment but rather instead sued under the Due Process Clause to challenge his/her detention, stated that a request by a detainee to overturn settled Circuit precedent was “better left for the Supreme Court.” In the Supreme Court’s words, it granted cert “on cue,” and on March 16, 2017, overturned the Seventh Circuit’s precedent by holding that pretrial detainees retained the right to sue under the Fourth Amendment over their detention for unlawful search and seizure. The Court held that the Fourth Amendment governs a claim for unlawful pretrial detention even beyond the start of legal process.
Continue Reading Supreme Court Reins in the Seventh Circuit and Reaffirms Fourth Amendment Protections